Joy Stephan Joy Stephan

Partnerships and Power Dynamics

You only get so far with a Sugar Daddy - Here's Why.

It’s understood that with money, comes power. Funders can choose to amplify the influence of money, or diminish its role. Similarly, nonprofits can approach a funder ‘hat in hand’, or as pro-active partners. It’s in the best interest for both to neutralize the influence money brings. Here’s why:

YOU ONLY GET SO FAR WITH A SUGAR DADDY

While NGO’s may fantasize about ‘benevolent funders’, there are limitations to no-strings-attached funds. Funding without commitment is tenuous; a foundation for trust to develop doesn’t exist.  Further, when funders are focused on the immediate impact, opportunities to innovate are limited. Nonprofits will be afraid to experiment with new methods that could make a more significant improvements if they fear blame and financial loss. Ultimately, funders who are invested in their partners learning and growth, and share a commitment to the partnership are best positioned to have a transformative impact on society.

Funding relationships are ultimately human relationships- they grow through mutual understanding, learning and appreciation. Positive emotions like these build strong, trusting bonds. These relationships, while more complex, are also more satisfying – to funders, service providers, and the community at large.

RESILIENCE IS THE NEW NORMAL

The economic downturn brought many lessons about the importance of resilience. Equitable relationships are inherently more resilient than transactional partnerships. Maintaining an equitable relationship builds greater trust, more flexibility and less micromanagement.

When partners understand they share the same over-arching goals and measures of success for their work together, it’s easier to maintain equity. For funders, this could mean asking about the drain on human resources that will come from taking on new projects. For nonprofits, could mean speaking up if a funder is suggesting something that makes them uncomfortable.

INVOLVE – DON’T SOLVE

Funding ignites a partnership and kindling keeps fires burning. Shared goals and communication create the kindling that keep partnerships alive. When partners involve one another, learn from one another, respect one another, and unite towards a common vision for success, people, partnerships and organizations can be changed in transformative ways.

Balanced working relationships benefit from diverse thinking, are more adaptive, and more sustainable. Funders and nonprofit leaders that understand how to discuss and navigate power dynamics forge trusting partnerships and make significant, positive impact, even during volatile times. 

Read More
Joy Stephan Joy Stephan

Transforming Partnerships, One Conversation at a Time

Like any good relationship, communication is key. When partners respect one another, learn from one another and unite towards a common goal, people, partnerships and organizations can be transformed.

It was the largest first-time funding commitment our department ever made. From the initial research to the first meeting, through site visits, internal meetings and reports, we were finally making the program a reality. But soon after high-fiving my colleague, I realized if this partnership evolved like others, it was likely the relationship was about to peak.

While our new partners were appreciative now, they already received gifts 10 times our size from other companies. Before long, we would talk about renewing for next year. Inevitably, they would ask for more. Dread was creeping in, and our partnership had just begun.

The realizations following that day changed my relationships with nonprofit partners forever and in the process, increased the impact of programs both for our company and the organizations we funded. 

THE ROAD TO TRUST IS PAVED WITH VULNERABILITY

During the first meeting, I let our new partner know that while we were as enthusiastic about the work they were doing as other funders, our decentralized structure meant it was unlikely our funding would reach similar levels. While maintaining high expectations, I encouraged an appropriate cultivation strategy and asked for their ideas about how we could work together most effectively.

Our partner was gracious and enthusiastic. They were delighted their proposal was compelling enough to earn a ‘reach’ gift their first year and appreciated the work done at the company on their behalf. While they confessed to imagining a larger ask in the future, they vowed to work diligently to impress the company leaders so and advocate on their behalf at any funding level. Future requests always included an opportunity for deeper reach, but never undermined the value of our initial gift.

LEARNING IS A TWO-WAY STREET

That moment of truth allowed us to celebrate a milestone, changed the trajectory of our relationship and defined how we would work together. After that conversation, others came more easily. We spoke about how we worked with other partners, and focused on learning about the partnerships that were most satisfying.  We discovered some clues to insure success in our relationship and started to create a shared vision of how we might work together most successfully. We also learned about how each of our organizations defined goals, got things done and monitored progress. These early conversations helped us work together efficiently and saved time later.

Like any good relationship, communication is key. When partners respect one another, learn from one another and unite towards a common goal, people, partnerships and organizations can be transformed. Further, starting a partnership on a more even playing field made it more resilient and efficient than others.

Read More